Intracept Procedure vs. Radiofrequency Ablation: What You Need to Know
More than 72 million American adults suffer from chronic low back pain. Back and neck pain can have a major impact on a person’s overall quality of life. This includes their ability to perform their favorite activities.
When it comes to managing chronic pain, there are various treatment options available. Each one has its own advantages and considerations. Two commonly used procedures are:
- Intracept procedure
- Radiofrequency ablation
Both methods aim to provide long-lasting pain relief. However, they differ in their approaches and effectiveness. In this blog post, we’ll explore the key aspects of each procedure to help you make an informed decision about your treatment. Let’s get started.
Intracept Procedure
The Intracept procedure is a minimally invasive technique that targets the basivertebral nerve. This nerve is often associated with chronic low back pain.
During the procedure, a small incision is made. Next, a specialized device is inserted into the vertebrae. The device uses radiofrequency energy to heat and disable the basivertebral nerve, thereby reducing pain signals.
Some of the advantages of the Intracept procedure include:
- Long-lasting pain relief
- Minimally invasive procedure
- Preserves spinal mobility
On the last point, because the Intracept procedure does not limit spinal movement, it allows patients to maintain their range of motion. Note that while the procedure is generally safe, there are potential risks associated with any medical intervention. These may include:
- Infection
- Bleeding
- Nerve damage
- Allergic reactions to anesthesia
You can learn about non pharmacological pain management here.
Radiofrequency Ablation
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is another minimally invasive procedure. It involves using heat generated by radiofrequency waves to interrupt the transmission of pain signals from nerves. It is often used to provide temporary relief from chronic back pain.
Some of the advantages of radiofrequency ablation include:
- Effective pain relief
- Minimally invasive
- Customizable treatment
Note that with RFA, the pain may eventually return. In such cases, repeat treatments may be necessary. Over time, patients may also experience nerve regeneration, leading to the return of pain.
Also note that RFA can target specific nerves contributing to pain, but it may not be effective for all types of low back pain. Proper evaluation and consultation with a healthcare professional are essential.
Intracept Procedure vs. Radiofrequency Ablation
In summary, both the Intracept procedure and RFA are minimally invasive treatments for chronic pain. The Intracept procedure provides longer-lasting relief by targeting a specific nerve. RFA, meanwhile, offers temporary relief by interrupting pain signals.
Choosing between the two depends on your specific condition and the advice of your healthcare provider. We recommend that you consult with a qualified specialist. That way, you can determine the best treatment approach for your individual needs.
Remember, these procedures aim to provide personalized pain management. This ensures that you receive the most suitable care for your chronic low back pain.
Like this blog post treating acute injuries? Be sure to check out our other informative articles on a wide range of interesting topics.
